On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 23:31:56 +0200 Michele Ravani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MR> >MR> I seem to have compilation problems again. MR> >MR> I don't understand, why you all seem to be compiling without problems MR> >MR> and I don't :o( MR> > MR> >I can only suggest updating wx from cvs. Or use 2.4.x, M always compiles MR> >with it. MR> > MR> I have resync'ed wxWindows cvs on July 17th and I am using the libraries MR> from that build. Then it is strange that you are reporting problems with almost 2 weeks old wx. MR> I guess that keeping wx updated isn't such a good idea after all. Huh? If you followed Vadim's and Robert's discussion about wizard, you should have noticed that wizard code was updated in wx cvs recently. So keeping wx updated is *required*, or, again, use 2.4.x. BTW, wx HEAD changes constantly, for example, M compiles, but does not link with it, so using 2.4.x would be much safer... Regards, Nerijus ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
