On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 15:33:55 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyhow, just one point: I realized that I don't understand at all what is
> your objection to shared_ptr<> is. You can use shared_ptr<incomplete_type>,
> the only requirment is that the type be complete at the point where the
> destructor is called. If the dtor of containing class is not inline, it
> should be ok...
Return chains call destructors.
shared_ptr<Profile> GetProfile() const
{ return m_someMember->GetProfile(); }
Inline functions that keep local pointers call destructors.
void SomeMethod()
{
shared_ptr<Profile> profile(mApplication->GetProfile());
profile->SomeFunction();
}
I think there are some source files that manipulate pointers without
calling any methods.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Mahogany-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
