On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:39:36 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or we could always feed to dspam not more than, say, 50Kb. I'd rather say that this is up to DSPAM to make sure it can process messages quick enough. But I agree that this is not so easy to do. I haven't tried DSPAM yet, as I personally use SpamProbe. I noticed that SpamProbe has acceptable speed in the sense that it does not slow too much the downloading of the messages from the servers. But I'm sure that if the processing had to be done on the fly (as is the case for DPSAM in M), then it could be much more of a problem... -- Xavier Nodet "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759.
pgpOvuRkZSVZE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
