On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 00:45:38 +0300 (EEST) Nerijus Baliunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1.2.4: > gpg --status-fd=2 --command-fd 0 --output - -a --verify /tmp/Mahoganycc4iCI > /tmp/Mahogany13oBXc > gpg: Signature made 2004 m. rugs�jo 01 d. 13:53:49 EEST using DSA key ID 87AABE34 > 1.2.5: > gpg --status-fd=2 --command-fd 0 --output - -a > [GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT 74 0 > gpg: Signature made 2004 m. rugs�jo 08 d. 17:28:22 EEST using DSA key ID D83511F6 It seems you did not compare exactly the same input with the two different GPG versions: the dates for the signatures are not the same (the time, at least). Anyway, I agree with Vadim that this should probably just be ignored. My understanding is that this tag (PLAINTEXT 74 0) describes the type of the signed data. We don't really mind about that... -- Xavier Nodet "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759.
pgpYMMmlnutqC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
