Vadim Zeitlin schrieb: > > Before I touch the M-code the build-system should be reformed. > Which one?
HOWTO build Mahogany. It means a Mahogany developer shouldn't build third-part libs (wx, imap, etc), too. > > Couldn't it be possible to compile and link them as libs or dlls? > > Well, this is what currently happens with MSVC -- we do build them all as > static libraries. Could you just create a package with all third-part libs compiled. So I (and other devs) just have to link against them, not to build them. > I don't think you should call c-client unprofessional. Anyhow, as I said, > it shouldn't be very difficult to reproduce the steps done by MSVC project > in a C::B project, I think C::B should be at least as flexible as MSVC. And > it's not really clear what alternative do you propose. The problem is not the IDE. The problem is that the imap-Makefile use nmake (MS make system). I have to rewrite the Makefiles If I want to build imap with MinGW make. I described why I do not want to use a MS build system. If I would use MS compiler and MS make it would be very silly If I would use a none-MS-IDE. So If I use C::B I will use it with MinGW or an other open build-system. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
