Hi,

I am new to this group, so I may miss some. However, I still feel happy to
discuss with you guys to make things better.

A standard presentation has the following benefit:
1) What is learned via Mahout can be recognized somewhere using other
software, for viewing, updating and predicting purpose;
2) What is learned using other ML or DM software can be applied the similar
processing on Mahout;

By the way, some models support updating with additional data, so we may
need to put this into consideration. Different learning from ground, the
input here is likely be a model described by XML. 

Thanks,

Shunkai 

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
发送时间: 2008年3月18日 0:28
收件人: [email protected]
主题: Re: input and output format following PMML specification

Is this also overlapping w/ what Karl suggested earlier using the Data  
Mining JSR?

On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Jeff Eastman wrote:

> I think the whole area of intra-Mahout and extra-Mahout  
> representations is
> one that needs further study. I glanced over the URL you provided  
> and this
> certainly looks like something to consider. It is a bit premature to  
> pick
> one at this point, but please feel free to investigate how it might be
> applied to Mahout. In terms of practical next steps you could:
>
> 1. Open a Jira to investigate external representation formats for  
> Mahout
> 2. Propose a set of criteria that you think ought to apply to such
> representations
> 3. Contribute a business case for why this particular representation  
> would
> satisfy those criteria
> 4. Investigate alternative representations and evaluate them so we  
> can be
> sure we have done a reasonable due diligence
>
> These steps would put us all in a much better position to answer your
> original question.
>
> Jeff
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: shunkai.fu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 6:24 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: input and output format following PMML specification
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Do you guys think we need support PMML format, in term of input and
>> output?
>>
>>
>>
>> It is proposed by several key companies focusing on DM, and you can  
>> find
>> more information on http://www.dmg.org/ .
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>>
>> Shunkai
>>
>>
>
>
>

--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucenebootcamp.com
Next Training: April 7, 2008 at ApacheCon Europe in Amsterdam

Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ





Reply via email to