Agree, that is an even better idea, just using this class. I agree, very well done. my only 'objection' is it uses Objects, and for my purposes I need to go farther to using only longs (and not even using Map.Entry or intermediate Reference objects). But in general until a piece of code hits that point, agree, use something already built. I don't feel like I have the authority to do this replacing but think it would prove a good change.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Ted Dunning<ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > yeah... but the difficulty of getting these implementations *really* right > is substantial. I would rather unify on the Google code if we need to do > that.
