[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12774025#action_12774025
 ] 

Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-196:
----------------------------------

It's an interesting question, yeah. One approach would be to cap this in the 
recommender, which makes some sense. Why would I ever estimate a movie was 
rated 6 stars? the only catch is then you lose some ordering information that 
the estimates provide. A 5.5 star movie should still be recommended before 5.4.

Let me think about a way to incorporate this. I imagine it is indeed just a 
matter of exposing some way to express limits.

> bounded values for RecommenderEvaluator
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-196
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-196
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Collaborative Filtering
>            Reporter: Jens Grivolla
>            Priority: Minor
>
> When evaluating a recommender using RMSRecommenderEvaluator (or some others) 
> on e.g. Netflix data, a recommender gets heavily penalized for predicting 
> values below 1 or above 5 (that are known to be out of the permitted bounds).
> It seems to me that it makes no sense to change the recommender to avoid 
> those predictions, since an estimated 6 probably has a greater chance to be 
> highly rated than a predicted 5.1.  I therefore propose to allow truncating 
> predictions to those "legal" values directly in the evaluator and leave the 
> recommenders unchanged, since it is more of a post-processing step than part 
> of the recommender itself.
> I added those boundaries to the constructor of RMSRecommenderEvaluator and 
> limit estimatedPreference to the allowed range before calculating 
> "realPref.getValue() - estimatedPreference" and seem to get slightly better 
> scores.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to