Well we do use AbstractVector. Are you suggesting that we *not* have a Vector interface at all, and *only* have an abstract base class? Similarly for Matrix?
-jake On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > We should use abstract classes almost everywhere instead of interfaces to > ease backward compatibility issues with user written extensions to Vectors > and Matrices. > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Grant Ingersoll (JIRA) <j...@apache.org > >wrote: > > > It seems like there is still some commonality between the two > > implementations (size, cardinality, etc.) that I think it would be > > worthwhile to keep SparseVector as an abstract class which the other two > > extend. > > > > > > -- > Ted Dunning, CTO > DeepDyve >
