I think both are desirable. Check in the generator and also the
generated code. It just keeps it simple.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The idea here is that the templates are checked in. The build process
> goes template-to-java and then compiles the java. In other words, the
> java classes are not checked in and editable.
>
> If this is not acceptable, I'll just manually create all the classes.
> It's just easier to keep them in sync if there's one source instead of
> 16 to edit. (The presumption here is that all of 16 classes
> {Byte,Char,Int,Long}x{Byte,Int,Char,Long} are really identical except
> for the data types).
