Ahhh... testing which impl is not critical. Testing stability, bounds, worst case speed, as Sean suggested, is good.
-jake On Dec 23, 2009 10:27 AM, "Benson Margulies" <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > '4' was lame humo... To be clearer about the lame joke: it's easy to test 'does it sort'. It's hard to test, 'does it correctly get implement this particular variation on quickSort which can be distinguished from others only by speed.' > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Er... four is a...
