Does your tree have math/src/main/java-templates/org/apache/mahout/math/list/ValueTypeArrayList.java.t
? On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fresh checkout and immediate mvn compile. Still compilation error > > http://pastebin.com/m4639e57f > > Robin > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> mvn -version >> Maven version: 2.0.9 >> Java version: 1.6.0_14 >> OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.21.7-2xen" arch: "i386" Family: "unix" >> >> Let me try again on a clean tree. I will reply soon >> >> Robin >> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Benson Margulies >> <bimargul...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Robin, did you look at the log I posted? >>> >>> What version of maven have you got? >>> >>> Yes, the better patch is up there. >>> >>> I'm really puzzled, as it worked for me on a clean tree. >>> >>> What appears in the target/generated-sources directory for you? >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > patch applies cleanly. >>> > >>> > mvn clean install is failing >>> > lots of cant find symbol errors like the one below >>> > >>> > >>> /ebs/mahout/math/src/main/java/org/apache/mahout/math/map/AbstractIntObjectMap.java:[15,38] >>> > cannot find symbol >>> > symbol : class IntProcedure >>> > location: package org.apache.mahout.math.function >>> > >>> > I tried going into codegen dir and running a mvn install but that too >>> isnt >>> > helping >>> > >>> > Robin >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I can volunteer for patching. But, on 229 jira page I see in the >>> comment >>> >> that you were going to repost the patch. I just see one file there. Is >>> that >>> >> the final one? >>> >> >>> >> Robin >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Benson Margulies < >>> bimargul...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Sean, my usual patch buddy, is off on vacation. Could someone else >>> >>> have a run at committing MAHOUT-229 so that I can move onto >>> >>> MAHOUT-230, which would benefit from prompt, though not crisis-level, >>> >>> attention? >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >
