[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796774#action_12796774
]
Jake Mannix commented on MAHOUT-233:
------------------------------------
{code}
String foo(int param1,
Object param2,
Float param3) throws Exception1,
Exception2
Exception3
{code}
Is there a reason why this is preferred over
{code}
String foo(int param1,
Object param2,
Float param3) throws Exception1,
Exception2
Exception3
{code}
lining up things that are the same is something I never understood why people
didn't do more... (hi there, my OCD-tendencies!). It makes it much easier on
the eyes to scan down the row of parameters, just as you can scan right to left
if they aren't wrapping.
> Modifying Mahout Check style to match our current coding style
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAHOUT-233
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-233
> Project: Mahout
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: 0.3
> Reporter: Robin Anil
> Fix For: 0.3
>
> Attachments: checkstyle-xml.patch, Eclipse-Codestyle.diff,
> Eclipse-Mahout-Codestyle.xml
>
>
> Checkstyle currently throws a lot of errors for small things like
> private static Logger log
> if(booleanVar == false) // Required for readability
> This task is created to track
> how to match the checkstyle to relax certain rules and
> changes in code for the strict ones
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
