I think its way premature to consider JNI... lots of this highlights places where we have yet to properly take advantage of the structures we have.
On Feb 17, 2010 1:45 AM, "Robin Anil" <robin.a...@gmail.com> wrote: Good thing about this is it shows SeqAcc is slower than RandAcc at many of the distance measures. I was thinking whether JNI calls to optimised native code for vector computation would yield better effect On that note found this under NewBSD license http://code.google.com/p/netlib-java/ Worth a look Robin On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote: > Cool, excellent st...
