[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12836817#action_12836817
]
Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-300:
------------------------------------
These are getting respectable!
As a quick hack, the fact that dot is commutative should make it possible to
get identical results for dense.dot(seq) as for seq.dot(dense). Likewise for
dense.dot(rand).
A similar, but less dramatic win might come from rnd.dot(seq) being redone as
seq.dot(rnd).
> Solve performance issues with Vector Implementations
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAHOUT-300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-300
> Project: Mahout
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.3
> Reporter: Robin Anil
> Fix For: 0.3
>
> Attachments: MAHOUT-300.patch, MAHOUT-300.patch, MAHOUT-300.patch,
> MAHOUT-300.patch, MAHOUT-300.patch, MAHOUT-300.patch, MAHOUT-300.patch,
> MAHOUT-300.patch, MAHOUT-300.patch
>
>
> AbstractVector operations like times
> public Vector times(double x) {
> Vector result = clone();
> Iterator<Element> iter = iterateNonZero();
> while (iter.hasNext()) {
> Element element = iter.next();
> int index = element.index();
> result.setQuick(index, element.get() * x);
> }
> return result;
> }
> should be implemented as follows
> public Vector times(double x) {
> Vector result = clone();
> Iterator<Element> iter = result.iterateNonZero();
> while (iter.hasNext()) {
> Element element = iter.next();
> element.set(element.get() * x);
> }
> return result;
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
