Exactly. On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>wrote:
> I assume he means mark 301 as fixed (when appropriate) and then open a new > ticket for follow on work marked for 0.4. > > -Grant > > On Feb 23, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Jake Mannix wrote: > > > What does this mean? You mean make a 301-continuation ticket for 0.4, > and > > reschedule the original 301 for 0.3? I could do that *if* 301 is in good > > shape > > by the time Hadoop is ready, but I don't want to reschedule it until it > is. > > > > -jake > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> WHat about a new follow-on JIRA so 301 can stay in the official release > >> notes? > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> So to be an annoying voice of dissent... I'm going to keep iterating on > >>> MAHOUT-301, > >>> targetted for 0.4, and I will keep it in patch form (not checked in) > _for > >>> now_... but > >>> if it can get its wrinkles ironed out before Hadoop gets its act > >> together, > >>> I > >>> really > >>> think it should get committed to 0.3. > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Ted Dunning, CTO > >> DeepDyve > >> > > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve
