On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:

> Confluence?

Yeah, that's pretty much it.  I'm thinking we have a static front page and then 
backed by some pages on Confluence.  Check out what http://ofbiz.apache.org.

-Grant


> 
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I can help out in the redesign. Is there a CMS approved by apache security,
>> something which will get patched automatically?
>> 
>> Robin
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Robin Anil wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Today is the day :)
>>> 
>>> Assuming it passes...  (which it should.)  We'll have some heavy lifting
>> to
>>> do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable,
>> just
>>> so people have reasonable expectations.
>>> 
>>> Anyone up for a website redesign?  I'm kind of thinking we do like OFBiz
>>> and have a nice landing page, and then everything else is driven off
>>> Confluence.  Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> -Grant
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies <
>> bimargul...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Here's a practical matter:
>>>>> 
>>>>> svn layout.
>>>>> 
>>>>> starting at the root we get, I propose:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - sandboxes
>>>>> - mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
>>>>> - collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
>>>>> 
>>>>> sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
>>>>> contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
>>>>> collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go in
>>>>> at the same level.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org
>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Yep.  Meeting is on the 21st.  I will be attending and letting y'all
>>> know
>>>>> what happens (I can't imagine it fails).  From the sounds of it, a
>> good
>>>>> chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to
>> go
>>>>> with two things:
>>>>>> 1. Mahout as TLP
>>>>>> 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I
>>>>> think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by
>>> some
>>>>> successful GSOC projects.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Grant
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
>>>>>>> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called)
>>> before
>>>>>>> we move forward with that, I thought.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -jake
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>              I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
>>>>>>>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP,
>> any
>>>>>>>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for
>> this?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Robin
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --------------------------
>>> Grant Ingersoll
>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
>>> 
>>> Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/

Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene: 
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search

Reply via email to