That article is a little bit out of date. That could be why it uses ant. There have been small code changes since then as well.
The best strategy is probably to get started and ask lots of questions here. Your experiences would make a good nugget for an update wiki page. On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it's Grant's package of demo code that uses Ant. The main > project indeed uses Maven. You should probably use the real 0.2 > release, which was just finalized this week. It should work with these > examples -- at least I cannot think of any change that would break it. > It's possible it needs a small change or two, at best. > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Patterson, Josh <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I've noticed that the article at: > > > > > > > > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-mahout/ > > > > > > > > uses Ant while release of Mahout 0.2 uses Maven. Also, the article's > > included downloadable code includes what looks like a snapshot version > > of Mahout 0.2 - is that essentially a copy of the release? Are there any > > other differences I should note when working through these examples? > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Josh Patterson > > > > TVA > > > > > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve
