Correction for the number of user and item data:
Users: 25K
Items: 2K

I am less worried about increasing the number of potential items to recommend.
I am more interested in getting more users into Taste, so the larger percentage 
of my users can get recommendations.
For example, to filter out users I require certain level of activity in terms 
of the number of items previously consumed.
With that threshold at 15, I get about 25K users (the above) -- so 25K users 
consumed 15 or more items
With 10, I get about 50K users who consumed 10 or more items.
With 5, I get about 200K users who consumed 5 or more items (presumably just 5 
items would produce good-enough recommendations)

I know I could lower the sampling rate and get more users in, but that feels 
like cheating and will lower the quality of recommendations.  I have a feeling 
even with the sampling rate of 1.0 I should be able to get more users into 
Taste and still have Taste give me recommendations in 100-200ms with only 
150-300 reqs/minute.


Otis



----- Original Message ----
> From: Otis Gospodnetic <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tue, November 24, 2009 2:10:07 PM
> Subject: Taste speed
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I've been using Taste for a while, but it's not scaling well, and I suspect 
> I'm 
> doing something wrong.
> When I say "not scaling well", this is what I mean:
> * I have 1 week's worth of data (user,item datapoints)
> * I don't have item preferences, so I'm using the boolean model
> * I have caching in front of Taste, so the rate of requests that Taste needs 
> to 
> handle is only 150-300 reqs/minute/server
> * The server is an 8-core 2.5GHz 32-bit machine with 32 GB of RAM
> * I use 2GB heap (-server -Xms2000M -Xmx2000M -XX:+AggressiveHeap 
> -XX:MaxPermSize=128M -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled 
> -XX:+CMSPermGenSweepingEnabled) and Java 1.5 (upgrade scheduled for Spring)
> 
> ** The bottom line is that with all of the above, I have to filter out less 
> popular items and less active users in order to be able to return 
> recommendations in a reasonable amount of time (e.g. 100-200 ms at the 
> 150-300 
> reqs/min rate).  In the end, after this filtering, I end up with, say, 30K 
> users 
> and 50K items, and that's what I use to build the DataModel.  If I remove 
> filtering and let more data in, the performance goes down the drain.
> 
> My feeling is 30K users and 50K items makes for an awfully small data set and 
> that Taste, esp. at only
> 150-300 reqs/min on an 8-core server should be much faster.  I have a feeling 
> I'm doing something wrong and that Taste is really capable of handling more 
> data, faster.  Here is the code I use to construct the recommender:
> 
>     idMigrator = LocalMemoryIDMigrator.getInstance();
>     model = MyDataModel.getInstance("itemType");
> 
>     // ItemSimilarity similarity = new LogLikelihoodSimilarity(model);
>     similarity = new TanimotoCoefficientSimilarity(model);
>     similarity = new CachingUserSimilarity(similarity, model);
> 
>     // hood size is 50, minSimilarity is 0.1, samplingRate is 1.0
>     hood = new NearestNUserNeighborhood(hoodSize, minSimilarity,similarity, 
> model, samplingRate);
> 
>     recommender = new GenericUserBasedRecommender(model, hood, similarity);
>     recommender = new CachingRecommender(recommender);
> 
> What do you think of the above numbers?
> 
> Thanks,
> Otis

Reply via email to