On Jan 2, 2010, at 6:23 PM, Bogdan Vatkov wrote: > Sorry guys, I was really mixing content, vector files, etc.
whew! > I now took the example from Grant above...I am just wondering if it is ok to > have --convergence 0.001...I ran my data with this value and I had to kill > it since it went to 5th iteration and was already running for an hour or so. > Is there away I can monitor the current number of convergence so that I can > roughly project how many iterations I will have to wait for? I don't know where I picked that number from, so, I guess I'd probably start with a bigger number and then validate.
