hi Sean,

I have just tried out the EuclideanDistanceSimilarity method to calculate user similarity, but there is something strange it don't understand. I use 200 as the neighbourhood size, and within this neighbourhood I get a prediction for around 75% of my test items using Pearson correlation, but with this new one, I get almost 95% covered for the same dataset. Just wondering why, because I would expect the same proportion, since the way that the algorithm calculates prediction did not change.

thanks,
Tamas

Reply via email to