hi Sean,
I have just tried out the EuclideanDistanceSimilarity method to
calculate user similarity, but there is something strange it don't
understand. I use 200 as the neighbourhood size, and within this
neighbourhood I get a prediction for around 75% of my test items using
Pearson correlation, but with this new one, I get almost 95% covered for
the same dataset. Just wondering why, because I would expect the same
proportion, since the way that the algorithm calculates prediction did
not change.
thanks,
Tamas