I thought the distinction was that it's a nicely hadoop-ified jar, which has a "lib" subdirectory with other jars in it...
-jake On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > That's Maven's convention I believe. I agree with you though. > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Jeff Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Robin, the .job file seems actually is a jar file, so why name it > > like that. Why not let it have another name with .jar extension? >
