On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 02:37:40PM -0700, J C Lawrence wrote: > > VM/XEmacs does the right thing too, with both Reply-To: that > > contains multiple addresses, and multiple Reply-To: headers in the > > original message. > > If I'm reading it correctly, multiple Reply-To headers violates RFC > 2822. The fact that VM supports it is fine, but that doesn't mean > Mailman should emit it.
If multiple headers are not supported, then I submit that we should assume that a multi address Reply-to may well be a bug in the spec; other address headers may appear multiple times, may they not? I'd go read 2822, but I'm too damned tired<tm>. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100 The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 804 5015 "Usenet: it's enough to make you loose your mind." -- me _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
