On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 15:16:17 -0400 Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> "JCL" == J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JCL> Aye, I'd like it as well. What's really needed is a JCL> per-subscriber config option which is controllable only by the JCL> ListOwner (there are good arguments for it being both invisible JCL> and visible to members) and is stored as part of the subscriber JCL> list. > Ah, I hadn't thought about that (making it visible but not > modifiable by the user). Right now, it's not even visible, > although it's pretty obvious should the user post to a list. >From a social engineering aspect there are advantages if "poster" users can be seen to be so flagged. There are similar is smaller advantages if a user can see a flag which says, "You (do not) have unrestricted posting authority to this list." There are also similarly large downsides to both. AdminOnly visibility seems the right starting point. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
