>>>>> "JRM" == Jason R Mastaler
>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> When USE_ENVELOPE_SENDER was the default, it was next to
>> useless because it rarely matched the sender's membership
>> address. So that's why it was disabled.
JRM> Understandable. By the same token, there are cases where
JRM> From doesn't match, but the envelope sender does. Checking
JRM> both by default will satisfy all cases.
True. I wonder if Reply-To: ought to be added to the mix? Note that
all are easily spoofable, so that argument doesn't bother me much.
If so, the order ought to go (I think)
1. From:
2. From_
3. Reply-To:
4. Sender:
>> Jason, do you think you could whip together a patch against
>> CVS, based on the above sketch?
JRM> Sure, I'll give it a shot. Thanks.
Cool.
Thanks,
-Barry
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
