On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 06:43, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > We're using 2.1cvs in production on python.org (for this list in > fact), so it's stable enough. There are still a few rough edges here > and there, but I'm watching it closely and trying to keep it patch.
I'm also using 2.1cvs in production, and it works fine! It has, as you
say, a few rough edges here and there yes.. ;)
An example: one of my boxes has 19 messages in qfiles/shunt...
I also have a bunch of errors in logs/error... :-/
They are mostly "ValueError: year out of range" errors (see bug
#571634). I also have a few "AlreadyLockedError"s:
Jul 24 04:06:57 2002 (3897) Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 105, in __oneloop
self.__onefile(msg, msgdata)
File "/home/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 154, in __onefile
keepqueued = self._dispose(mlist, msg, msgdata)
File "/home/mailman/Mailman/Queue/ArchRunner.py", line 34, in _dispose
mlist.Lock(timeout=mm_cfg.LIST_LOCK_TIMEOUT)
File "/home/mailman/Mailman/MailList.py", line 143, in Lock
self.__lock.lock(timeout)
File "/home/mailman/Mailman/LockFile.py", line 284, in lock
raise AlreadyLockedError
AlreadyLockedError
And a couple of web tracebacks, too lengthy to dump here, let me know if
you want 'em. ;)
> I will likely release another beta sometime this week or by the
> weekend. At that point I'll feel good enough about it to migrate the
> rest of the mailman-* lists over to it.
Ok, would be nice if you could weed through the bug reports on SF.net
and maybe fix some of them before you release a new beta, though..
(Which would probably give me time to catch up on the norwegian
translation... ;)
-Daniel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
