* Michael Zieger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > just a short question to Mailman 2.0.6 (rpm from SuSE7.3):
As good as RPM's are, and how they make life a lot easier on a lot of software, mailman is a peice of software that works better installed from source. There's too much system dependent information that mailman relies on (mail gid & gid for cgi's to run for example). > I installed everything and created a list. After adding members, I sent > an e-mail via kmail to the list. But the arriving e-mail does not > contain any "list-id" headers. According to documentation, it should be > there, but no, it's not. Do you know what could be the problem? I can't answer this, I don't have a mailman 2.0.6 installation, but my guess in the version number lies the problem. > BTW, looks like a great piece of software. I try with just one list now > and if it's good, I'll implement it for my customers. I'd suggest implementing mailman 2.1.1 for your customers. It's a LOT nicer, a lot slicker, a lot cleaner, a lot more customizable, a lot more everything than <2.1. Good luck! And come back with any other questions, sorry I couldn't answer your list-id question, but since your this early in your experience, i'd be smarter to jump in with mailman 2.1.1 instead of 2.0.6. -- Matthew Davis http://dogpound.vnet.net/ Use your MasterCard to pay your Visa bill. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
