On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:47:54AM -0400, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Where is your fix for this bug?
I've mentioned two bugs in my email you've quoted below. One [ 665732 ] is fixed, the other [ 815297 ] is not. The patch for the former is attached to the bug report. (Can't verify as sf is currently down for maintenance.) > ---------- Original Message ----------- > From: Bernhard Reiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:22:19 +0200 > Subject: [Mailman-Developers] Bug priorities (for 2.1.3)? > > I have a question and a remark regarding the handling of bugs: > > > > * What attributes do bugs need to get into the next release > > when a fix is available. As announced on the 14th of August to this > > list I fixed a priority 7 bug and did not receive feedback on it. > > Is there a special reason why it wasn't included in the 2.1.3 release? > > [ 665732 ] List-Id should be one line. > > > > * There is a very annoying bug (reproduced with 2.1.2, 2.1.3 test > > scheduled) in environments where people sign their emails, > > because Mailman breaks the signature. > > > > [ 815297 ] Breaking signatures in message/rfc822 attachement! > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=815297&group_id=103&atid=100103 > > > > I suggest raising the priority of this bug, > > because it might give Mailman a bad reputation with > > security aware people. > > And once established such an image is hard to loose again.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
