Quoting Brad Knowles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> At 10:06 AM +0100 2004/05/04, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> > They should not do this if the mail is marked as "low priority" - ie
> > Precedence set to values like "list" or "junk".  It could be worth
> > talking to panix about this.
> 
>       I believe that I had seen and responded to his previous posting 
> on mailman-users.  IIRC, Panix isn't about to change how they do 

Sorry, I don't believe I saw any responses to my question on mailman-users.

> >       * Filter the delay warnings before they hit mailman by using an
> >         MTA filter of some form.
> 
>       IIRC, Paul is using an ISP where he has no control over the MTA, 
> and he's not about to change ISPs to a place where he might have more 
> control over this.

I do have some control over the MTA.  But it does seem a little ridiculous
to filter out warnings (but not errors) just because mailman insists on
treating warnings as errors.


-- 
Paul Tomblin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
I'm just waiting for the day that someone decides that "ignorant moron" is
an ethnic group, and thus cannot be discriminated against.
              -- Christian Wagner

_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to