On 2/27/2005 17:46, "Preston Wade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I read some old post back in 2002 on this list about Load balancing. In my > scenario I don't have near the volume to warrant load balancing but I am > interested in fail over capabilities. Would it cause Mailman any heartburn if > I simply wrote an rsync script to keep the trees in sync? We do this. It seems to be successful. > And then use the > heartbeat package to do automatic fail over. I realize depending on my sync > cycle I will potentially loose some data. Is there a better alternative to > this? We stopped trying to use heartbeat long ago, when of the first 10 auto-triggered switches, all proved to be false "alarms" by the heartbeat code. (Not just for this purpose.) > > Also I saw there are plans to move to a user store were users would have one > password for all list. Have there been any considerations for LDAP as that > user store? There have...I hope LDAP isn't the only choice when the change happens (we're moving away from LDAP, having become tired of repairing broken LDAP databases). --John _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp