Hi, Stefan: thanks a lot for publishing your patch! Of course, this is _very_ helpful!
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:31:56AM +0100, Stefan Schlott wrote: <snip> > >> I didn't figure out at > >> first glance how chunking works... otherwise, a mail might be encrypted > >> to several recipients - increasing its length by several bytes, but > >> reducing the number of forks of gpg processes. > > > > You definitely need to encrypt the message to all recipients, then > >send out one copy. Anything else would be prohibitively expensive in > >terms of computation time for any reasonable number of recipients. > > This will create huge messages in large MLs. Further, this will reveal > all recipients' key ids - something not wanted in anonymous lists. > Imho the tradeoff lies somewhere inbetween - encrypt messages to n > recipients (yet to be implemented). I guess gpg's --throw-keyid option is useful here. Bye, Joost -- Joost van Baal http://abramowitz.uvt.nl/ Tilburg University [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Netherlands
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
