Thank you John! I've updated the bug tracker. Mr. Mottram also changed his page after a little discussion with me.
John Dennis wrote: > On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 06:53 +0900, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > >>Hi Developers, >> >>There is a rumor that mailman security check is not proper and >>recommending patch to void our security check. Can someone write >>a refutation to this article? (In a fluent English of course ;-) > > >>Bugs item #1188133, was opened at 2005-04-22 15:58 >>Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter >>You can respond by visiting: >>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1188133&group_id=103 > > > I believe Geoff Mottram may be confused with how mailman's security > works. > (snip) > Note: I have only responded to this list, I have not updated the > original bug posting. > -- Tokio Kikuchi, tkikuchi@ is.kochi-u.ac.jp http://weather.is.kochi-u.ac.jp/ _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
