Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote: > Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The key people you've got to convince are Tokio and Mark --
Since I've been nominated as a key person to convince, here's one remark. > The general idea is to have use the "foo", "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" strings as the internal list identifiers, and then > successively solve or work around all the issues this change implies. There are existing patches that are linked directly or indirectly from FAQ 4.47. These all seem to use things like foo_bar.com and foo_bla.org as the internal list identifier and they all seem to do an incomplete job of "solve or work around all the issues this change implies". Anyway, my intent is not to critique other solutions, but to say that I would much prefer to see a directory inserted rather than a host_name appended. This has performance advantages and might fit better with a scheme of "hashed" intermediate directories to help sites with very large numbers of lists. Once you add the infrastructure for one intermediate directory, it may become simpler to add more intermediate directories I.e, for the initial cut, split the lists/<listname> structure into lists/<hostname>/<listname> and similarly for archives/private and archives/public. Anyway, it's your project, but I think we'd all welcome a complete solution to this problem. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
