On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 17:09 -0400, James Ralston wrote: > We're going to implement it, because we really don't have any choice. > :/
...and later... > Since disabling the Sender header processing is literally a one-line > patch, we're going to go ahead and do it. If it breaks horribly (even > for a small percentage of users) we'll know; if it makes our users > happy, we'll know that too. Definitely let us know how it goes! > This problem is so bad for us that some list owners are demanding that > we abandon Mailman in favor of some other list manager. (They're also > incensed about Mailman's bounce processing options, but that's another > topic.) Please do start a new thread with your feedback here. Fixing the bounce processor is definitely one of the things I want to do for MM2.2. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
