On 2/6/07 5:51 PM, "Bob Puff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If a bad DK isn't bad, then how is this supposed to help spam? I mean, if the > mere presence of some signature in the headers will increase the likelihood of > an email being delivered (or at least help it NOT be tagged as spam), surely > the spammers will pick up on this, and the whole benefit lost.
They have. Much of the spam I see from the "new breed legitimate spammers"* contains DKIM signatures. (I have to assume those verify OK, else why put them in.) * "new breed legitimate spammers": That is, in the US, those who carefully conform to CAN-SPAM as far as one can tell--one can't really tell whether they "share" unsubscribed addresses with other spammers as likely new victims without probing. --John _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
