*shimmied over to mailman-devs* (from -users)
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:33:06AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> It kind of sucks that there are so many other Mailman command line
> scripts, which is one reason why I've always put them in a separate
> Mailman specific bin directory. With MM3 though I intend to use a
> 'subcommand' approach so that there's only one 'mailman' command.
> Think things like 'mailman listmembers foo'. I'll probably keep
> mailmanctl separate though I haven't decided about that yet.
Would it too much to ask for the 'old' (read 'current') scripts/commands
to be aliased: at least in the first few releases?
e.g., for 'list_members' to link to 'mailman listmembers'
Perhaps as an install/configure/compilation option?
"Create old-style links?"
--old-style-links
(maybe that's more for people who package: ISTR a couple of packagers
are on list, yes?)
(wonders how many other people have scripts that would need re-writing
otherwise...)
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
