Brian J Mingus wrote: > >Perhaps the failure of the mailman dev team to attract community >participation can be related not to any crazy versioning scheme but rather >to a failure to engage with the community. I have only recently subscribed >to this list
You are subscribed to mailman-users, not mailman-developers. >and I can say that you and every other person that read my >e-mail saw fit to ignore it. Not true. There have been extreme moderation delays recently and your post was only delivered to the mailman-users list on Sunday and it has not been ignored. I apologize for the moderation delay. We have added more resources to the task which we hope will help. >Your null hypothesis, namely that people who >send questions and not patches to the list are not worth your time, costs >you dearly in the long run. If you read the archives of the mailman-users and mailman-developers lists, I think you'll find that the above statement is unjustified. Further, during the moderation delay, I had an irc conversation on #mailman with someone about the subject of your original mailman-users post. Was that you? Does that seem like I think your issue is not worth my time? -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
