On Wednesday 30 June 2010 04:15:46 Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 06:19 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >On 6/29/2010 6:15 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >> It may just be time to ditch the Sender rewriting in Mailman 3.  I
> >> don't think a reading of RFC 5322 can justify it, and I'm pretty
> >> sure getting bounce processing right with modern MTAs no longer
> >> requires it.
> >
> >+1
> 
> Done in r6915.  I also removed the setting of the Errors-To header.

Cool.  I set the status of bug 266824 to Fix Committed.

Any chance to have my patch applied to 2.1 (and/or 2.2)?  I ask because I 
have to take care of some mailing lists on a shared server and I doubt 
that the admin will upgrade to 3.0 any time soon but I might convince him 
to go for the next 2.1 release once/if it is out and packaged :)

Cheers,
Malte
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9

Reply via email to