This seems "out of place" for MM, per se. Providing this material is something that is intimately tied to the archiver.
As I see it, the only thing that MM can do is to provide a "pass thru" conduit to whatever archiver the installation has chosen. Wacky On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I think we'll probably do something like this in Mailman 3, but also, > I'm much more fond of providing a Gmane-like NNTP interface to the > archives. I find myself subscribing to fewer mailing lists these days > and just reading (and replying!) to them via Gmane. Works great. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman > Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283751 > > Title: > feature request: fetch archived emails _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9