On Jul 12, 2011, at 08:52 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (e.g., mailbox > not found, no access, or command rejected for policy reasons) > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5321.txt, section 4.2.3. Reply > Codes in Numeric Order>
That would be my preference too. I recently had a use case for something like this. The import-sig on python.org was retired a few years ago, but I just resurrected it for the PEP 382 discussion. I probably would have used this feature for these sigs. It does lead me to think that "retired" might be a better term, and it makes me wonder whether actions like subscribing to a retired list would still be allowed. But maybe the OP has a different use case in mind and we could have a need for both a long-term, permanently failing retired lists, and shorter term, temporarily failing disabled lists. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
