> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 2:50 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] New RFC on using DKIM with MLMs > > I agree, and have no objection to advocacy, or to RFCs that take > advantage of more modern thinking. But that's very different from > arguing that a defect in the DKIM RFC is really a problem of the > implementations.
Well, I also don't agree with characterizing this as a defect in the DKIM RFC. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
