Pierre-Elliott Bécue writes: > It seems that if I want to have a good source package, I need 5 repos : > > - Mailman > - HyperKitty > - Postorius > - HyperKitty - MailMan Plugin > - MailmanClient
In the spirit of the refactoring, I would say mailman-core (mailman + mailmanclient), hyperkitty, and postorious should be three separate packages in Debian. Exactly which repos are needed, I'm not sure. Mailman3 (or mailman-suite) would be a trivial package that depends on all of the above. > My first question is "Am I right?". And the second one is whould I > consider looking into mailman-suite-doc and also have it in the > source package? No, Debian breaks out doc packages anyway. I think as long as upstream is a separate repo, you may as well just have a separate source package for mailman-suite-doc, too. > On another way, I also see that there is a standalone postorius repo and > also some django project files for HyperKitty in another one. I have the > impression it is more designed for people to work on as standalone - > forkable projects for other features, and so I wouldn't need them in a > Debian package. No, IIRC these are variants which don't need a separate webserver such as Apache (convenient for testing), but they're still closely tied to mailman core and mailmanclient. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9