Aditya Divekar writes: > Yes, in that case the arc verification would need to be postponed to after > the entire code for the header generation has been written. I'll need to > rethink the milestones a bit, since this testing part would have to be > added at the end, and things will change quite a bit.
That's what I wanted to hear! We're making rapid progress! Let me know your thoughts on milestones. There's no huge hurry, since applications haven't even opened yet. > On a side note, would posting on the arc-discuss list for help in > the above problem of testing be acceptable? Yes, but not yet. I should probably review your first post or two before posting, as well. There are plenty of friendly, helpful people on the IETF lists[1], but the lists themselves are rather different in tone and style from most open-source projects. Footnotes: [1] Technically arc-discuss is hosted by dmarc.org, not the IETF, but it's the same people. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
