On Mar 22, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Aditya Divekar wrote: >So according to what I've gathered from the conversation, the fall back on >the user name can be made implicit. The user name is to be always used in >case of missing display name for the subscribed address.
Right. >The feature for suggesting the display names from the other records i.e. >linked via the user, but not subscribed, could, as suggested, be raised in >postorius for the UI part. Right, and thus, not in core. >@Barry The mr code would first check if a display name is provided while >subscription i.e. `member.address.display_name`. If not, it will check if >the linked user has a display name and use that if it exists >i.e. `member.user.display_name`. And as a final case when both these fail, it >will use an empty string. I'll go ahead and make these changes. Yes, I think that's it. Cheers, -Barry
pgpUgWSC9WO0Y.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
