On Jun 04, 2016, at 08:46 AM, Terri Oda wrote: >I'm not sure "rest" is the way it's currently being used either: it might be >more useful to rename it to be like the wait-for-mailman tag to indicate bugs >that occur due to mailmanclient.
'wait-for-mailman' is just a little weird given that we use the term 'mailman' for the whole umbrella project. 'wait-for-core' is a little better but it doesn't accurately describe blockers on mailman.client. 'wait-for-api'? I'm also okay with leaving it as it us until/unless we figure out something better. -Barry _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
