> > > I don't understand what you're worried about. Of course if you change > all the names, especially with some sort of automatic process, there's > a pretty good chance of introducing typos. We fix them as we find > them, that's all. >
Yes, I went ahead and made the changes. I have a separate module 'arcpy' installed in my python dist-packages now which is basically the refactored 'dkimpy' package. I don't think its the best of names since it doesn't give the idea of presence of DKIM signing/verifying features. Any ideas for the same? I have a server with a fixed IP which could just pipe mail to a Python > script that reads it and passes the message to the ARC module for > processing. Then the script can send it back out if necessary. > That should work for us! Also we would need to have a DMARC and DKIM record set up though for the signing domain. The procedures for that are easy, and are outlined in detail on the net. So if we have a domain name associated with the ip, I'll go ahead and make the TXT records. Else, we'll have to create a new one. I'm not aware of any way to avoid this. Let me know if you are aware of any :) Aditya _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9