Hello everybody, I'd like to see PGP support for MM3 but I thought it might be a little to early to file an issue.
My original motivation was a setup of a full encrypted mailing list. I'm well aware of the fact that it provides not the security a full end-to-end encrypted communication provides, but for some people (including me) it is an acceptable compromise. Encrypted mailing for groups of people is still a mess in 2016: * Either the group is relatively static or you never encrypt the mail for all people. * All members need to know each other. And you need the keys of all the other members. So far for the motivation. Below there are some initial thoughts: **Treat mail differently based on their signing status:** 1. Whether it has a signature or not. 2. Whether the signature is valid or not. 3. Whether the signing key matches the key of the list member. **Treat mail differently based on their encryption status** Whether it is encrypted or not. **Other opportunities** 1. A public key per list. 2. Signing of outgoing mails with that list key. 3. Encryption of outgoing mails with that list key. 4. Send a mail with the lists public key on request. Which one of these points a worth an implementation? Regards Dominik
pgphEezjeZRMq.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
