On Mar 30, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >Would you recommend against even exploring for a lightweight approach >for some reason? Ie, the idea is bad according to some principle?
To the contrary, I think if it were possible it would be pretty nice. In fact, you could conceivably eliminate mailman-client if you could do it, and other languages could auto-generate bindings to the REST API. I haven't kept up on the state of the art, but IIRC, there were Python libraries that could generate bindings based on WADL. Cheers, -Barry
pgpWUNDtMcI44.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
