On Thu, May 16, 2019, at 5:45 AM, A. Schulze wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm porting a mailman installation from a legacy server into docker.
> To make it not more complicated I decided to stay on the same mailman  
> version 2.1.29 (build from source)
> 
> Now I'm faced to the problem that mailman is started with "mailmanctl start"
> This fork a daemon running in background. In an ideal docker world  
> there is only one process per container.
> If the process return/end, the container terminate.
> 
> For now I solved this by running "fghack mailmanctl start"
> fghack -> https://cr.yp.to/daemontools/fghack.html
> 
> Q1: is there a better way to start mailman in some kind of non forking mode?
> Q2: is it possible to run mailman3 supervised?

Yes, you can run the "master" command in Mailman 3 to run it in foreground
instead. That is what we do for Docker images.

I am not super familiar with mailman 2, but it uses the same runners. Perhaps,
it is possible to do the same with mailman2? 
> 
> Thanks!
> Andreas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailman-Developers mailing list -- mailman-developers@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-developers-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-developers.python.org/
> Mailman FAQ: https://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
> 
> Security Policy: https://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
>

-- 
  thanks,
  Abhilash Raj (maxking)
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list -- mailman-developers@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-developers-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-developers.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: https://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3

Security Policy: https://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9

Reply via email to