On 9/28/25 07:27, [email protected] wrote:
Specifically the kind where all list emails come from the the same address,
with the sender in Reply-To?
It seems like this /should/ be the way it works. Isn't that what Reply-To is
for?
Do some email clients still mess it up? If they do, wouldn't it make sense to
just send them a bounce notice and tell them to clean up their act?
See
https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/handlers/dmarc.py?ref_type=heads#L66-L85
for what we say about this.
I'm guessing that your concern is that a `reply` as opposed to `reply
all` should go to the poster and not to the list. I think that will be
the case with most mainstream MUAs, but RFC 5322 is somewhat wishy-washy
about that saying only "When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it
indicates the address(es) to which the author of the message suggests
that replies be sent."
--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
_______________________________________________
Mailman-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/
Archived at:
https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/MN5V74RTZBDD4U4CZFOI2OGVL4UNQN4B/
This message sent to [email protected]
